18$ Marlboro Carton
Visit the new
Dynamic Truth
-
Michael Savage Forum
|
|
|
|
Listen to Michael Savage
Debka File - US Cooperation with Israel? Drudge Report - Preparations for Iraq War.
Meet Your Hero
Coming Soon: Scott Ritter, Enemy of our State. Saudi Arabia - Friend or Foe?
JOIN US IN: The War on Terror... The War on Hollywood... The War on Misinformation.
|
More Islamist Fugitives Enter US
Illegally and are Sought After by FBI Islam has declared war on us. They shoot our missionaries. They assassinate our charitable doctors in their own hospitals. They lob grenades in churches in far away lands. We declare that Islam is peaceful. They blow up ships. We say the war is not with Islam. They are suicide bombers and killers. We do nothing; we protect foreigners that enter the country illegally. The gunman, named as Abed Abdel Razzak Kamel, 35, was overpowered by security staff. Yemeni officials said he had confessed to being a member of a group called Islamic Jihad and to having shot the Americans "because they were preaching Christianity in a Muslim country". He allegedly told police he carried out the attacks to "cleanse his religion and get closer to Allah". Russians Kill Own Citizens, But Protect Saddam Hussein
Within hours of disclosing the nature of the poison gas crack Russian commandos discharged on their own citizens, the honorable Russian representative to the UN expressed opposition to a strict and forceful Security Council resolution on Iraq. Yes, the same domineering draconian government in Russia that waited days before disclosing the type of gas used to kill almost 200 of its own citizens, did not want to back up UN weapons inspections with the use of force. When they themselves used poison gas on their own comrades, they also do not want to endorse the search for poison gas in Iraq. The Russians that target innocents do not want to hold the Butcher of Baghdad accountable. Sounds a lot like "do as we say NOT as we do." Using the Russian model for precedence, we should unleash our massive stores of poison gas on our own citizens and dissidents, but dare not we back the scores of UN resolutions dating back to 1990. Where is the outcry? Where is Amnesty International? Where is the righteous ACLU? Where is Jesse HIJACKson? Perhaps they are all too busy supporting and defending their anti-constitution of the United States. Maybe they are defending convicted muslim extremist terrorists. Or perhaps they are on the payroll of the villains of the Man-Boy-Love-Association. They hardly have any time away from their defense of homosexual pedophiles and other deranged perverts of the world. How dare we focus on the Russian human rights violations when our own intelligence is being violated back home. I find it morbidly interesting that as the Minnesota senate race heated up, Sen Wellstone died only to leave a rejuvenated 75 year old Walter Mondale to jump dozens of points ahead in the polls. Almost too convenient for my taste. Seems tragically similar to that rat Torricelli resigning from his race like a fourth grader quitting a race at recess - again only to leave behind yet another geriatric democrat-has-been to jump ahead in that decrepit state's polls. Is this bizarro-world or what? Is this the year for our Senate to be saved by ex-senators with a legacy of being losers holding human growth hormone in one hand and the liberal handbook in the other hand. For all those that have never amounted to anything, that have lost or destroyed anything they have ever placed their grubby little paws on, Mondale is their poster-child. A legacy of losing, and losing big - is what he brings to the corrupt table. And these same Demagogue-Democrats accused Bush of stealing the 2000 election? HELLO POT, THIS IS THE KETTLE CALLING! The democrats are the only spineless creatures on earth that can turn a morose funeral service into a jocund political rally. Muhammed,
DC Sniper - Ex-US Army Muslim?
What exactly is going on? How many more chilling stories is the media going to circulate about Muslim (Americans) that were trained by our military to do their evil deeds? In this case that means a cold calculated sniper that kills with precision from hundreds of yards away. Again, we sat in agony, painful patience waiting for descriptions to be released, for profiles to be circulated, for cooperation to be solicited from the police. I believe that the collective media gave a nervous whimper when they realized that in fact the shooter was muslim and that they absolutely had to divulge this to the public. Could even this admission be considered racial profiling? So the immoral dilemma that the liberal media faces every day. First, let us correct a few miscalculations by the media - Mr. Muhammed was NOT a military sniper. His military occupational specialty was combat engineering, NOT sniper or sharpshooter. The only piece of his military resume linking him to his prolific shooting abilities was his "expert marksman" badge - merely an award won on the firing range, not a specialized school of assassins. Again, the media would like to plant thoughts of our United States Army forging assassin operators from unsuspected muslim-extremists-to-be. Seems like there was a little too much emphasis on the military angle and not enough on the muslim connection. Then there was the speculation that we would never be able to pin the weapon found with the bullets recovered. In fact the whole ballistics test took a mere several hours and proved conclusive for at least half a dozen of the shootings. Certainly the 'innocent before proven guilty' idealism was stretched beyond the outrageous when Larry King interviewed the Sniper's ex-sister-in-law and gave her the opportunity to speak freely into the CNN propaganda microphone. At this point the suspect had been caught red handed, with weapon linked to the shootings, with a illegal alien linked to armed robbery and murder in Alabama, with ballistics matches, with finger prints matched to the crime scene, and various ammunition and suspicious accounts of their activities in Tacoma, she still gave her holy certainty that Muhammed was innocent. This whole interview was absolutely comical with my actual intelligence being sucked out of me as I watched the dumbing-down of America on my idiot box of a TV. This sister-in-law placed blame on the incident on the suspect "snapping" after his experiences in Desert Storm, which he was a veteran of. She failed to acknowledge that Desert Storm officially ended on midnight of Feb 28 1991 - a mere eleven and a half years ago. Again, we must ask, how many more links to islam? How many more extremists must infiltrate out own armed forces? And, with the discovery that the boy-accomplice was an illegal from Jamaica, how many more murderous illegals does it take to close the borders -- or at least to keep the borders merely ajar? The paradigm shift is inevitable, yet will never happen with the stranglehold of information and the defeatist attitude that encompasses our own homeland defense. BORDERS, LANGUAGE, CULTURE. Defend them now, or nevermore. Comment on this article * * * John Allen Muhammad, 41, was known as John Allen Williams before he converted to Islam some years ago. At 6ft 1in tall and about 180 pounds, Mr Muhammad is an ex-US soldier who served in the Gulf War. The Seattle Times newspaper quotes federal sources who say the two men may have been motivated by anti-U.S. sentiment in the wake of the September 11 attacks. The sources say both men were known to speak sympathetically about the hijackers who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The newspaper says Mr. Muhammad is a Muslim convert who changed his name from John Allen Williams last year. Reports say Mr. Muhammad is a former Army soldier and Gulf War veteran who at one time was stationed near Tacoma, in the northwestern state of Washington. U.S. federal agents searched the backyard of a home in Tacoma late Wednesday. Read full article. Can we Start Profiling NOW?
Okay, enough is enough. Obviously the war is against terrorists and not against all of islam, but it's time we started using common sense. Take a good look at their pictures. Are we still strip-searching 80-year old grandmothers in wheelchairs at the airport and turning a blind eye from our muslim extremists? We can continue the same self-destructive and defeatist strategy or we can set ourselves up for success. The difference this time is that no election, no political statement, no humanitarian principle is on the line, just the fate of humankind. Let us be the first to proclaim it - the Crusades are coming. We are dealing with far more than a few pockets of dissention. For every cell like this one in Oregon (of which they did not capture them all), there are hundreds more that are loose and collaborating on the destruction of our nation. Now that they have infiltrated our peaceful neighborhoods, our schools, and now, our military. Yes, when they can use our own military as their dubious training ground, we know that we are NOT winning the war on terror. It has not been that long since the debate of guns in the cockpit. Before that it was the cockpit doors being secured. And before that it was X-rays checking for bombs. A distinguished former Israeli security administration official stated - "the difference is that America is searching for weapons, whereas Israel is searching for terrorists." This is a true statement. Is it easier to find an ounce of explosives hidden in a shoe or a band of militant islamic terrorists muttering anti-American slogans and gesturing maliciously? Although we are still undoing the ill-effects of the Clinton and Torricelli intelligence-dismemberment, we can fight back and fight smartly. It is true that there are still nations that refuse to pass on passenger manifests to our government agents prior to an international flight arriving - in fact Saudi Arabia refuses to do this. The nation of most of the 19 hijackers finds it ethically wrong to divulge the names of the arabs on their planes. The same nation that embraces islamic fundamentalism like we revere professional sports. The first step in the war on terror is identifying the enemy, not to apply a politically diluted filter to blur our defenses and make us "feel better". If we can learn from history, we should. Why is it that we are only looking at a few pieces of the puzzle? After we saw the terrible tragedy on September 11th 2001 when arab terrorists rammed US airliners into our buildings, we decreed that we would beef-up airport and airline security to prevent planes from being hijacked. When we learned that they used box-cutters to do their evil deeds, we dictated that no similar objects would be allowed on board. When we saw that the last plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was headed for the White House of Capital, we forbade aircraft from flying into and out of Washington Reagan Airport. We tried to avoid these events from happening in the future. We tried to learn from history. But, when we saw that 19 out of the 19 hijackers were muslim extremist arabs, we did nothing to pursue. When we found that a majority of these fundamentalists were from Saudi Arabia, our ally, we did nothing to prevent future maniacal Saudis from repeating the same acts. When we saw that many of the hijackers had immigration violations, we did nothing to combat illegal immigrations or to try and control our porous borders. Folks, we are hypocrites even in our own eyes. I cannot explain the level of inaction and political selfishness that permeates our government even in this time of tragedy and war. Let's do the right thing now, before it is too late... Read a Letter to Saudi Arabia (a brilliant editorial). Corrupt Torricelli Weakened Our Nation
Muslim Extremists Execute Christian Charity Workers in Pakistan Recent History of Pakistan's Fast-Spreading Religious War Against Christianity
DynamicTruth has predicted a massive surge in religious violence. Although your liberal media will have you believe the only violence is the savage acts of war against the innocent muslims, our analysis will show that it is the muslim extremists that are marching to the next crusades. You will see that although no one wants to call it a war against Islam, the extremists will turn it into just that. Thousands March for Pakistani Christians - September 29 The Real Iraq Questions We will not sink to the same low as the rest of our self-serving elected officials. With the fate of humanity on the line, we will not let self defense of our nation be tainted by political trickery and skull-duggery. Your biased media is in a trance-like focus on the Iraq Question, not as a point of national security, but a stage to play political puppets against each other. Why must the liberal media dwell on making this a partisan-political issue? We can only speculate. I don't care about which Senator or Congressman wants to use this as his political springboard. I don't want to link defending our nation to elections this fall, or sinister campaigns, or illegal fundraising. The American public does not want a debate on who voted for what bill when we really need to be deciding which bombs to load on which planes. Instead of the typical Clintonesque flashy, hollow, political Trojan horse, here are the real questions we need to be asking, exploring, and investigating. 1. What weapons were not destroyed by the inspectors? We know that at best, we destroyed 90% of Iraq's known weapons of mass destruction stockpile. What weapons eluded us? We can use the recent Scott Ritter born-again-pacifist speculations, but I want to know the truth. Of the weapons and infrastructure that was destroyed, I want to know how easily can they rebuild these pieces, and more importantly, which countries supplied them and can do so today. I want specifics, exactly where the precision centrifuges can be obtained; which countries are producing and exporting the precision timers and chemical storage facilities needed. Additionally, how long did it take Iraq to assemble its previous stockpile - surely this progress can allude to its current treacherous capabilities. 2. What methods of deception did Iraq use to cheat the UNSCOM inspectors? Never has it fully been disclosed how the Iraqis specifically hid weapons, hampered inspections, and covered up violations. How can we hope to succeed in this next round of inspections without knowing what failed last time? We cannot hand out the same test to someone who cheated on the last. 3. Will Iraq use weapons of mass destruction? Again, we cannot guess blindly, trusting the good faith of professed murderers and terrorists. We have to realize that there is no doubt whatsoever that Iraq will not hesitate to use weapons of mass destruction. They already have. This is but a passing blurb in the news. But the over 60,000 Iraqi innocents that suffered from the effects of a blister agent called mustard gas cannot be forgotten. The several thousand that died immediately were far better off that the scores that the incendiary suffered side effects including cancer. This is not what the media wants to tell you. Methods of delivery back then were crude. Weapon effectiveness, equally crude back in the 1980s. What is Saddam capable of today? 4. Would muslim extremist terrorists hesitate from using a weapon of mass destruction? The age of Mutually Assured Destruction are over. 'Brinkmanship', 'First Strike' - these are all terms of the past. We cannot for one second doubt the absolute determination and iron resolve in these terrorists. They exist for only one reason - the destruction of the United States. If they do not even value their own lives, how can we expect them to value ours? The question is not "will they use such weapons?" The question is WHEN. And the only logical answer is, as soon as they get their hands on them. 5. Are we going to wait until they use a weapon of mass destruction before we can prove that they have them? This is the ultimate question. If we follow the reckless words of Scott Ritter and wait for absolute proof, I am certain that we will never know until they trigger the device in our cities. Unfortunately, we cannot wait for shadow-of-a-doubt proof like a patient jury deliberating the OJ Simpson verdict. This is not a question of sportsmanship, or partisan politics, or even world opinion, this is a matter of life or death. Even disillusioned people like Mr. Ritter can agree to that. We use terms like national security and weapons of mass destruction to define a mission, our liberal friends use them like a punch line. These are the questions that need to be raised by your liberal media. Read Archived OP-ED - 9Sep02
International
Calling Cards |
Buy Cheap Cigarettes |
Michael Savage |
Duty Free Cigarettes Powered by DynamicTruth.com
|
The list of distinguished accomplishments for the soon to be
ex-senator is long and tainted. As a true Clinton-Cronie and
America-hater, Torricelli is proudly known for the Torricelli Principle (so
disgracefully named). This principle served as a vice-grip handcuff
restricting the effectiveness of the CIA. As a self-serving Democrat,
Torricelli limited the intelligence gathering powers of the CIA and proudly
helped to tear apart America's defenses. We are still waiting for his
apology for our intelligence lapses leading to September 11. The only
other accomplishments of citizen Torricelli involve mass-corruption,
chastising by both houses of Congress, accepting illegal contributions and
attempting to cover-up any public disclosure of such dirty deeds. Yes,
a legacy has been left by your New Jersey senator. What a report card.
Who else can take credit for destroying our nation's nation defense, taking
bribes and getting caught, getting reprimanded by the House and Senate, and
then running a half-ass re-election campaign only to quit like a scared
petty-thief that got caught. It takes a lot to disgrace the Democratic
party, but Mr. Torricelli has breached those rock-bottom standards.
Torricelli miscalculated one thing - nobody likes a dirty-stinking-thief.
You are a quitter and a disgrace to your country.